Hi Russ -- guess what, geologists knows about transgressions and they also know about the fossil record. They can study index fossils within the transgressions, for example. It is often not difficult to spot a transgression because you can see within the rock where the water level has risen or fallen.

I'm curious about whether you read much from those links I provided before you wrote them off as "speculation and assumption." How is it an assumption that the transgressions in the Grand Canyon are known and studied, in direct contradiction of what your video claims? How are cataloguing index fossils and isotopes of calcium or oxygen deposits within the transgressions, "speculation and assumption?"

There are so many links out there about transgressions around the world and the fossils they contain, I thought it wouldn't be necessary to list some here and I invited you to Google. Here is a well-studied one in Japan, to pick one example.

By the way, may I remind you for the third time that radiometric dating of igneous deposits above and below the sediment give upper and lower age limits.

If you'd like to provide some evidence for your claims, we can carry on the discussion.