There are no transitional fossils because immediate transitions are impossible to prove. There are only fossils containing a mosaic of fossils, but these are not transitional.

This is by the admission of the talk origins website itself:

http://urlbam.com/ha/M002A



Dating is notoriously inaccurate and fossils are dated using circular reasoning.

This fallacy has been finally recognized by the growing skeptics of the evolution myth:

http://urlbam.com/ha/K



The "fossil record" is inconsistent with current scientific explanations and has been overturned by strata/layering discoveries.

The old explanations are wrong and are based on vast assumptions, as is most of evolution, which is why it is referred to as a religion:

http://urlbam.com/ha/M002C



Possibly, but not surprisingly, the most biased people in the world because they have paid to have disinformation drilled into their skulls for several more years than the rest of us.

This is no different than the fact that most dentists still believe that dental amalgams are harmless.

People are finally realizing that those letters following people's names usually mean that people know a lot about the current state of a profession, but tend to lack in common sense (perhaps due to the increased susceptibility to social pressure):

http://urlbam.com/ha/M001k


"As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion [of halfway species] instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?"

—Charles Darwin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1966), p. 139.