I said:
I have asked twice now whether anyone here equates belief in the inerrancy of the Bible with Biblical literalism, which seems a reasonable conclusion to me.
CTD claimed:
False. You have not even asked once.
post 48067
She was also correct in saying that no literal statements were made about evolutionists going to hell (just people who don't believe in the inerrancy of the Bible -- you did not tell me if you think this means the same thing as a Biblical literalist).
post 48055
As I see it, believing in the inerrancy of the Bible is the same as being a Biblical literalist, which means a creationist.
I wrote "As I see it" because I was willing to be corrected by anyone who chose to tell me that they thought this statement was false. I guess it doesn't meet the strict criteria of "asking" but the intention was certainly to confirm the statement in the eyes of creationists talking here.
I also said:
I have also asked why someone thought this thread discussing hypocrites and liars is so pertinent to this particular forum that they overruled Bex's decision to move it to the Bible forum.
CTD said:
Another question which is not to be found in this thread.
post 48067
As an aside, I think Bex actually did the correct thing by moving this thread to the Bible forum. Someone obviously overruled her and moved it back here.
I'm sorry if the questioning nature of the statement was lost on you because of the lack of a question mark. I'll try to be more literal in future.
The rest of your post is nothing but a mass of
ad hominem that seems rather immoderate for a moderator. If I'd gone on a tirade like this about creationists here I'd be banned.
Why don't you stop sniping and simply answer my questions? Can you do that, or at least attempt to? Or if not, just leave it for Abishag to reply if she wants. Further evasions of my questions and
ad hominem remarks will be ignored.
