Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be saying that the very few scientists who are creationists are of the correct opinion, even though you'd be hard pressed to find creationists in fields which are directly related to evolution (such as genetics or biology) and the age of the earth (geology).

You also seem to be saying that these evolutionist scientists -- the vast majority of the scientific population -- are ignoring or lying about evidence for a worldwide flood which does actually exist but has not been made public (the term "evogoggles" is apparently a pejorative one suggesting that people are blind to, or wilfully ignoring, the truth).

I notice that you have not actually answered my questions in the above post about what we are supposed to do about existing evidence if we are to become creationists. You seem to be implying that we should accept your word for it that there really is evidence for a worldwide flood but it's being concealed. I can't say I'd easily be swayed by this, I don't like to take someone's word for it and prefer to see the evidence on which their words are based. Maybe you can go to an appropriate thread here and present your evidence for the worldwide flood. If I've been fooled by the establishment then I and everyone else reading this ought to know. I suggest you avoid the Grand Canyon because that has already been discussed and I am not satisfied that you have proved anything about it being carved by one catastrophic flood.

I also note the absence of a reply to my question about the sorting of fossils in the geological record. I can't see how this fits into all life being created simultaneously, or a worldwide flood in which many of these simultaneously created creatures died. I'd have a lot of trouble sweeping this under the carpet if I were to become a creationist. What should I do? Maybe you could also discuss this in an appropriate thread.

I need to reconcile spirituality with the world around me. I personally can't lie to myself about one in order to believe what I want about the other, a sentiment which ties in well with the title of this thread. I don't have a problem with this, but I would if I decided I had to believe in the simultaneous creation of all living things on earth and a universe that is 6000 years old.