|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,178
Master Elite Member
|
As far as I know, no protection was given. But I'm doubtful that was the cause. Even amalgam drilling without protection didn't do this to me. And no previous replacing of composites did either. I'm aware they all contain toxic elements - and extra exposure will not help matters and will make a person more toxic - but something else happened to me. Toxins can be removed. It has been 5 years now since that dental work was done. There is something else going on that stems from that which has caused a mysterious permanent problem.
There is more to it than an exposure to toxins during a removal. This has been a permanent condition and a blockage in responding to detoxing. Again, there appears to be a deadened area (dead pulp) somewhere on the lower left side according to one doctor. But sadly it does not seem to show the problems on xray or cavit scan.
I got the virus in 2003, and that was bad enough. But the worst came following the dental work in 2004. That's when everything fell apart. It all ties in and I'd say it's been on thing after another. Toxins can be detoxed, but when you have something going on that is blocking your system from detoxing, you have a real problem. Somewhere also in what happened is related to what has happened to my gut area too.
The doctor who detected the dead pulp/gangrene suggested that there is a connection also.
Cutler states that if a person comes to a standstill and stops responding to chelation and cavitations are present, that they should be seen to. Easier said than done. Hal Huggins also talks about cavitation patients are sicker than amalgam ones. So it is quite possible that maybe what it is, OR something similar blocking healing responses. It is not pyschological, it is most definitely physical. I can almost pinpoint when this started.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Bex, an article you should read
|
JK98
|
02/28/09 06:32 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/01/09 04:06 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/01/09 08:33 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/01/09 09:47 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/01/09 04:37 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/01/09 05:47 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/01/09 07:11 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/01/09 08:54 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
gdawson6
|
03/01/09 09:08 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/01/09 09:25 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
gdawson6
|
03/01/09 09:58 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/01/09 11:14 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
JK98
|
03/02/09 02:39 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
JK98
|
03/02/09 03:41 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/02/09 04:00 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/02/09 10:53 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/02/09 11:02 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/02/09 11:41 AM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/02/09 12:05 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
jammes
|
03/01/09 09:56 PM
|
Re: Bex, an article you should read
|
Bex
|
03/02/09 03:51 AM
|
|
|
|