Originally Posted by CTD
I find it amusing that many of their lies are so polywrong they can be debunked different ways using independent lines of reasoning.

While this is a weakness, it is also a trap. To look at a polywrong argument, spot an error, and assume the rest is valid would be to fall into the trap and accept untruth as truth. One should be careful not to fall victim to excessively stupid arguments.
Then bring one up and show us how easy it is to debunk it. I believe that is what Russ is asking you guys to do.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke