I made the letters bigger as an expression to say this, "Have you read anything I said?", not emotionalism. You should know that about me by now.

Personally, I love this debate because any logical person sees the truth through the disinformation, and I happen to love truth, and I love helping people see it.



Here's a hint from Wikipedia:

"The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the universal law of increasing entropy, stating that the entropy of an isolated system which is not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium."


We're going in circles here. I've explained that molecules tend toward their simplest stable state.

Are you saying this this isn't true?

As I said, the making of complex molecules in cells is assisted by intelligently designed machines therein. This is a far from from claiming that they self-assemble in the environment. In fact, all the difference in the world.

You're argument is comparable to this:

Hey, water flows uphill. I know because my well is underground but water still comes out at the faucets.

Not good.

You're on baseless ground here (still).



You're being blatantly deceptive here and you must know it.

So, do you believe that molecules self-assemble into proteins?

See how tiny --> ( http://urlbam.com/ha/M0029 )


"Darwinism is a creed not only with scientists committed to document the all-purpose role of natural selection. It is a creed with masses of people who have, at best, a vague notion of the mechanism of evolution as proposed by Darwin, let alone as further complicated by his successors."

—S. Jaki, Cosmos and Creator (1982).