Oh look! Another scientist who wasn't fired for expressing his creationist views! It's starting to turn that "fear of losing their jobs" argument into vapor.
Not all are, but many have been.
Are you claiming that no scientist has ever been fired for expressing creationist views?No, I am not. (Is there some reason that you feel you need to shout?) What I am saying is that there are a number of scientists who have expressed their creationist views (see
here) yet have not been fired. So if most scientists (as you claim) see the flaws in evolution but don't say so, it cannot be because they fear losing their jobs. If that group of "most" scientists "told the truth" then they would represent a significant block of the scientific community and would wield a bit of power. Now the question is: if it is not fear of retribution that stops them from speaking up, then why do they still support the theory of evolution?
What was said on the video only told me that he saw problems with the assembly of amino acids into proteins. The first problem with his declaration is that they do that all the time in the cells.
Yes they do, and that is not a "problem" with his argument.
Amino acids become proteins in cells
with the help of a mind-bogglingly complex array of coordinated machines working together to assemble them; Another strong evidence for intelligent design.
Obviously organic chemistry is a real mystery to you. Everything that happens in a cell is simply chemistry. The right conditions result in the right molecules being formed. Could the conditions exist outside the cell to form some proteins? Possibly.
This is all stated in the short video you watched. Why did you miss it?
Because all he said is that he was convinced that amino acids could not have formed proteins by themselves. It's nice that he is convinced but I am not convinced by his saying that he is. Just as I would not be convinced that the Holocaust was faked just because a Jewish man said so.
So, by implication, do you claim that DNA formed all by itself?
Not "by itself" but through a long series of chemical reactions that occurred because the right conditions existed at particular times.
Do you feel that insulting my point of view it the correct method to convince me of the truth in your point of view?
