I have had some responses from people from either side. Either criticised for not being firm enough regarding chlorella and products like it and needing to be more emphatic about Cutler's protocol OR criticised for the total opposite (for critising products like chlorella and advocating Cutler's protocol).

I've upset people on both sides unfortunately. So I realise there really is no winning this argument.

If you do well on these products Sean, then perhaps it's wise to stick with it. Your body obviously hungers for what they contain and thrives on it. Perhaps it is those who are low in sulfur that require the extra sulfur. Maybe others who get hurt by it, already have high sulfur and the extra sulfur acts instead as a mobiliser? I don't know, I maybe completely wrong.

It may well be the way each body responds to different ways of detoxing. As I said, the odd thing was, there were times I felt REALLY good on chlorella and other times I went almost pscyho after it. It was unpredictable for me. So it was not something I was overly comfortable with, since i never knew which way it was going to go.

Mercury is not really something you want to mess with. I have no idea whether damage was done by mobilising this stuff too much or not. Certainly I went through a lot of hell at the time of doing it. I hate to imagine what may have been done in those times. Mercury itself, being poisoned for so many years of my life would likely have damaged me regardless though. So it's hard to say.

Maybe not everybody is going to find the Cutler protocol the answer, but it has a very good track record and is a logical and well thought out protocol and one that ought to be tried at least. I know there are some people who seem to do well on the very things that Cutler warns about. Perhaps they are the exception rather than the rule though. Certainly I've heard enough negatives on mobilising agents and other protocols to feel that a warning is necessary in any case. I was hurt enough myself to understand how it feels.