|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Thanks for being true to form and providing semantic gymnastics while ignoring evidence. Come now. Are you really so confused that you think pointing out abuse of a term is subject to condemnation, and the abuse itself is not? If you have evidence that an experimentally testable hypothesis exists, I see nothing preventing you from presenting it. Indeed, the internet makes it pretty easy, because one can link to evidence. By now you've probably realised that you are preaching to the converted and will not actually be converting anybody. Just out of curiosity, have you considered other more productive ways to express your enjoyment of writing? Not meaning to sound pedantic, but you have intelligence. Do you think that writing anti-evolution posts on internet forums is the best way to use it? It took a while but I came to a similar conclusion, from the opposite point of view obviously. I'll see to my own priorities. In the past there were assertions that I needed to debunk all bunk. Until I see consistency, I doubt I'll take any of your advice too seriously. Your argument comes pretty close to assuming I'm right. Either that or you assume nobody here would do me the service of providing a "theory" of evolution if they should become aware of one. But I don't kid myself. If it should turn out that there is no proper "theory" of evolution, scarcely a handful of evolutionists would dream of changing their religion. They might however, encounter a little more difficulty in convincing thinking persons to consider adopting it in full or in part.
Last edited by CTD; 02/08/09 11:28 AM. Reason: typo
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
