At first glance, you would think so, but it's more complicated than that.

First there are at least 4 different kinds of chemtrails that I've observed. (I won't bore you with the details.)

Second, the monsters doing this would have certainly premeditated every way their activity might be detected and would have certainly found ways to avoid detection. Rain water is collected all over the world and tested on a regular basis, so this would be a primary issue they would need to overcome.

It may be that the kinds of chemtrails that contain heavy metals are prepared in such a way that they would not be detected in the samples taken. How could they do this?

One possibility is making them oil-based.

Water and oil don't mix, and wet-deposition sampling methods seem to indicate that the collection devices used overflow for a while before samples are taken (That's what I've been told by the people I've spoken with). The oil floats on the top of the sample and runs off long before samples are taken, so obviously, the metals are never detected.

The oil coating could be prepared much like dry copy-machine and printer toner is prepared (except some printers use wax-based coatings like Canon "EX" engines used in Canon, HP, and Lexmark printers). Very small particles of metal are coated and then dispersed.

This method would also have the advantage of making the micro-particles "sticky". This would increase their chances of adhering to human skin, eyes, clothing, shoes, and hair. If the oils contained certain amino acids or proteins, assimilation into human skin may be greatly enhanced.

The "oil" hypothesis has some evidence behind it.

We've all seen the chemtrail "rainbows" that appear when the sun shines through chemtrails. This may be caused by light refraction through the oil. Some have even inadvertently referred to this rainbow effect as an oily film "appearance".

Also, much of the chemtrail fallout that has been physically collected on the ground has been oily. This applies to both the "film" collected from hard surfaces, like cars, and the dissolving (and non-dissolving) spiderweb fallout that immediately dissolves when touched.

Also, some news video shows mercury that was detected in the sticky fallout.

Anecdotally, I can say without doubt that the symptoms that I experience from chemtrails are identical to mercury poisoning.

Finally, from my research background, I would actually expect mercury to be one of the prime candidates to be used to poison a large population (as has been done with amalgam fillings and vaccines) because mercury is slow-acting, accumulative, and causes a myriad of diseases that are hard to trace back to the exposure.

Not only this, but considering the massive liability that pharmaceutical companies are potentially facing because of vaccine damage, it makes perfect sense that now would be the time to pollute the environment with mercury so as to dilute the "blame" leaving big pharma off the hook in the courtroom.

See: http://urlbam.com/ha/M0022

If someone was willing to do testing that would specifically test oil-based aerosols, this could be telling and helpful, but I'm not going to wait that long. I am taking measures to protect my health because I believe the next 5 years are going to get worse and worse, and those who wait for "conclusive results" are going to be the same ones waiting for free government vaccines; Ya' know, the kind they give you when flu season comes around.

So, "What's wrong with those", you may ask.

Well, they contain mercury.