At this point I can't even tell if your "scientists" are even scientists at all. I know Hovind isn't. His degree is in Christian education. It's obvious when he speaks that he knows little about how things work. His points about conservation of momentum and the second law of thermodynamics are especially humorous since those are areas that I studied in order to get my engineering degree.
A person's credentials have little to do with their capacity for common sense. In fact, I've know a lot of people with PhD's and have found that a larger percentage of them have much less common sense than the typical home business owner.
People have to learn to think for themselves rather then to simply accept what they're told, as in the education system.
Hovind produces some of the most enlightening information available on the evolution hoax (hence, he is hated by religious-evolutionist fanatics), yet scientists still can't figure out why no transitional forms have been found.
I strongly suggest everyone watch this video:
http://urlbam.com/ha/KYet failed to point to even one.
All I'm asking you to do is to lift a finger.
Is your search engine broken or are we avoiding "difficult" information?
Actually, I have provided links previously but you ignored them.
I've done my homework. That research is up to you.
I'm still waiting for you to respond to the reason you claim my math is off at the top of this post.
You made a claim, now back it up.
What questions were those 2 paleontologists asked? Some transitional forms are more difficult to find because the transition is small. Transitionals between large taxonomic groups do exist. The Whale transitionals are a good example of the transition from land to sea creature despite the relatively close relationship.
You should know that this is just more of the same empty and baseless evolution-religion talk.
There are no whale transitions. C'mon, give us a link. Please!
And so you believe that evolution has been going on for billions of years yet we're still having trouble finding transitional forms?
You really have to open your eyes man.
The only justification for war for a Christian is self defense and a command of God.
Or if God says "Go kill them all and take the land that I have promised to Abraham"
Yes, that would be a command of God.
If you studied the Bible as hard as you claim to study evolution, you would realize that those who were killed by Israel were "put under the ban" because they had committed horrific crimes against humanity on a vast scale, and God knew they were only going to continue this activity.
I believe all of those put under the ban during the conquering of Israel were tribes of the giants (nephilim):
See:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M0018An example of defense is this. You come into my house with a gun acting as if you're going to murder me, therefore, I have a right to kill you to defend my life. That's Biblical law.
Verse please.
(Exodus 22:2)
Are you really a Christian? Do you read the Bible daily?
LinearAQ, you have failed to follow up on every point of evidence that I have brought up.
You failed to address the math involved in this very thread.
You continually let these vital flaws to the evolution religion go unanswered, yet, you continue to accuse me of the same.
At the top of this thread, I provided a strong argument for the fallacy of the evolution faith, and it continues to goes unanswered.
I would welcome a real conversation if you would ever followup on any of these points.
