Originally Posted by Russ
Originally Posted by LinearAQ
Some estimates have shown some properly applied dating methods to be off by as much as 20%.


And other scientists have estimated these properly applied dating methods to be off much, much more than that.
I understand that you believe this to be so since you have said it more than once. Could you provide some names and, perhaps, writings by these scientists so I can look at their evidence myself?

Quote
My position is for an old universe and that the Earth has been recently changed/altered/improved/prepared for life by God.

http://urlbam.com/ha/M0020
I have read your position on the age of the earth and posed a few questions to further my understanding of it. Those questions are posted right after your bump post

Quote
I feel bad for those who have not realized the depth and saturation of deception that comes out of the political arm of "science" today. This political arm provides so much bad data and faked evidence that it makes it hard for non-conspiratorialists to grasp the big pictures.
Still don't feel like naming names here? Maybe you really work for them and are just trying to make their exposure look silly.

Quote
This video helps to put some of that information into perspective:

http://urlbam.com/ha/u
The video wouldn't load for me. It's probably my computer connection today so I will have to wait to see it. I'm sure that even if I forget about this post, you will be posting the link again.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke