Originally Posted by LinearAQ
Some estimates have shown some properly applied dating methods to be off by as much as 20%.


And other scientists have estimated these properly applied dating methods to be off much, much more than that.

Quote
Ironically, the RATE project's publication states that they found the radioactive decay evidence points to an Earth that is over 500,000,000 years old and they haven't found the method of heat removal that would be required to prevent the earth from melting if that decay happened in just 10,000 years. However, they are confident that there must have been a way for it to happen.


My position is for an old universe and that the Earth has been recently changed/altered/improved/prepared for life by God.

http://urlbam.com/ha/M0020

I think this is the best interpretation of the (actual) evidence.

I feel bad for those who have not realized the depth and saturation of deception that comes out of the political arm of "science" today. This political arm provides so much bad data and faked evidence that it makes it hard for non-conspiratorialists to grasp the big pictures.

This video helps to put some of that information into perspective:

http://urlbam.com/ha/u

The Captian
Today they call you "crazy". Tomorrow they call you "ahead of your time."
Global Skywatch Learn about Chemtrails - You're breathing them now!
OnlyTheBestHerbs.com World-class supplements
Mercury Talk Why you are sick.
OneUp Domains Domains, Hosting, Email
1-800-358-4278 (U.S. & Canada)