Quote
Between 540 and 510 million years ago.


OK, good. Some actual conversation.

So, how do we arrive at those numbers? You said...

Quote
by radiometric dating of volcanic rock deposits on either side of the deposits with Cambrian fossils in them.


OK, so how reliable are these forms of dating?

I know that you must know that this is a very good question because there is a ton of evidence out there that radiometric dating is faulty. There is also a solid argument (superior in my opinion) that fossil dating is based on circular reasoning propelled by an agenda (like much junk science).

My point in asking this is clear: I have found that when you walk down any path of reasoning that claims to support evolution (and I have), you find discrepancies and junk science by the boatloads. It's very much like mercury-safety science or global warming. Anyone who looks closely enough finds a clear pattern of agenda setting.

So, go ahead and tell me. How reliable?

The Captian
Today they call you "crazy". Tomorrow they call you "ahead of your time."
Global Skywatch Learn about Chemtrails - You're breathing them now!
OnlyTheBestHerbs.com World-class supplements
Mercury Talk Why you are sick.
OneUp Domains Domains, Hosting, Email
1-800-358-4278 (U.S. & Canada)