Originally Posted by CTD
Trial-and-error is guided by intelligence in every example of "evolutionary design". This (for those who understand valid vs. false analogies) is not analogous to 'natural selection'. It might be argued that it is "automated 'artificial selection'", but I'll worry about that when an evolutionist comes along who's honest enough to make the argument.
What is it about automated artificial selection that is different than natural selection insofar as its effect on the population undergoing evolution?

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke