I disagree completely about silver.

I know enough about human nature to know that people have opinions that they share far and wide, and they are often not based on sound information.

I know that people can be very assumptive. For example, a person taking silver with something else got sick and may have assumed that it was the silver because of something they heard from a friend. They then told you they "got sick using silver". You (perhaps) believed their judgement and then you now say, "I know someone who got sick on silver."

I know countless people who have used colloidal silver for years. I have myself. There are volumes of studies that show it's safety. In fact there is no known toxic mechanism for silver—none whatsoever—except argyria, which is not only extremely rare (only a couple known cases compared to huge numbers of users of colloidal silver), but caused by dramatic abuse of homemade large-particle silver which is, by definition, not colloidal, so in truth, even argyria is not an exception to the safety record of colloidal silver.

The media lies about colloidal silver because it affects the cash flow of one of their biggest advertisers: The pharmaceutical industry. It is an enormous threat to their antibiotic markets.

I like Andy and I think he's a great doctor, but I certainly disagree with him on a couple things. My disagreement is not because I hold a self-sacred opinion, but because I've read credible medical/university research that contradicts things he believes. Of course, the same can be said of any doctor. We all have opinions, and I know that doctors can be particularly opinionated. After all, I grew up in a medical family and was surrounded by them for years. (Nothing against doctors. This is simply what I've observed.)

As for me, I prefer to rely on research and science, and so I have used Colloidal silver and it has done wonders for me, and countless others that I personally know.

Again, there is no known toxicity for true colloidal silver. None—Zero—It doesn't exist. And this is based on a large volume; 200 years of research. I've personally read a lot of it.

By the way, mercury is not so great at killing biotics. It's effectiveness has been called into question by several studies, which further raises questions as to the motivation for it's use in vaccines. (Population control?)

See: http://urlbam.com/ha/M001R