You have not even decided to grace us with your definition of transitional forms. You obviously won't accept the transitional forms that paleontologists have categorized as such.
Placing fossils in a catagory of "evolution" does not = evidence that such a scenario ever took place. Similarities between creatures does not indicate that one evolved from the other.
Yet, NASA uses evolutionary methods for antenna design. Maybe chance and error are more capable than you think.
Believe what you want. Just don't expect science to buy it without some evidence.
I clicked the link, but the page will not load. At what point in the
design of the antenna did they stop to give the rest up to process/chance/error? I'd imagine anybody employing such methods with passenger airline Jets would not be employed for long
But I'd be interested in how using evolution methods produced the final product...
