Missed one

Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
Until I send you to a Hindu, why should we pretend I have? I see your desire to pretend so, but you have not provided any motive for me.
You indicated that you and a Hindu would agree on more things than you and an atheist would. I was just asking what things you would agree on that an atheist would not. You could at least try to address something I actually wrote.
I did not say any such thing. It cannot be for my benefit that these words are put in my mouth. I couldn't believe if I tried, for I know what I, myself, have actually said.

I also know that some entities are unable to argue honestly, in a manner consistent with the regulations of this forum.

Quote
You feel that your false analogy was successful?
You assume that which you attempt to prove. And then some. My analysis is not an analogy. The evolutionists do send people to the "expert" researchers, and the "expert" researchers do agree with creationists on more points.

This is a fallacy. Cherry-picking the opinions of these "expert" researchers is improper and deceptive.


Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson