Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
Their disagreement is over which hair-brained scenario is even plausible enough to pursue.

"Chemical process"... get real. Life is made of physical, chemical matter. We know chemicals would be involved. The agreement is that God was not involved, and this agreement is reflected in the scores I tallied.
Which one of the scenerios states that God was not involved in the process?
Every last one of them. If they even admit that God might be involved, they are classified as "religion". You're simply being contrary for the sake of being contrary; nothing new.

Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
You colour yourself something else. I have not sent you to a Hindu to ask about Jesus. I do not recognize any Hindu as an expert in discussing Jesus.
Then what do you ask about that you and the Hindu would agree on and an atheist would not. Rember, this is about having more alike with the other theists than with the atheist.
Until I send you to a Hindu, why should we pretend I have? I see your desire to pretend so, but you have not provided any motive for me.

Quote
Quote
Evolutionists have directed us to look at what these researchers have to report. See the difference(s) yet?
Nope! Perhaps you could spell it out for me, such that you prove your statistical analysis is less false than mine.
Oh well. I tried. And reviewing my efforts, I don't see a lot of room for improvement. I would expect you to be intimately familiar with false analogy. Based upon your extensive practice of the art, it is likely you know more about constructing one than anyone present.

Then again, if you had a record of constructing successful false analogies, that would be considerably more impressive.

I suggest you ponder this desire to have me pretend I sent you to a Hindu, when I have not done so. I think maybe you'll discover the key. At least on a subconscious level, I'm confident you already have.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson