Originally Posted by CTD
Originally Posted by LinearAq
My attempt at humor fell on deaf ears (or would that be blind eyes since you were reading it?). Even so, you couldn't resist being snide, could you?
The "attempt at humor" might've been easier to detect if it had been accompanied or followed by an answer.

...then again, maybe the omission of answer is supposed to be the funny part...
And maybe you failed to recognize that I said I would no longer discuss my beliefs regarding God or any other deities. So buzz off.

Quote
Quote

Actually it is chemists and biologists researching abiogenesis that are in disagreement as to the mechanism by which life came about....lest anyone try to make more of it than it is. Indeed they all agree that the process was a chemical one. Seems like they are only in disagreement over the which chemical processes were involved.
Their disagreement is over which hair-brained scenario is even plausible enough to pursue.

"Chemical process"... get real. Life is made of physical, chemical matter. We know chemicals would be involved. The agreement is that God was not involved, and this agreement is reflected in the scores I tallied.
Which one of the scenerios states that God was not involved in the process?

Quote
Quote
Quote
If I send someone to a Hindu to verify something, you may expect said Hindu to largely agree with me on the relevant points. Maybe this expectation is not the case with everyone? Maybe that's just how I roll?

So they would agree that Jesus is the only path to everlasting life? Color me surprised.
You colour yourself something else. I have not sent you to a Hindu to ask about Jesus. I do not recognize any Hindu as an expert in discussing Jesus.
Then what do you ask about that you and the Hindu would agree on and an atheist would not. Rember, this is about having more alike with the other theists than with the atheist.

Quote
Evolutionists have directed us to look at what these researchers have to report. See the difference(s) yet?
Nope! Perhaps you could spell it out for me, such that you prove your statistical analysis is less false than mine.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke