|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 644
Elite Member
|
Nothing I repeated or provide reference to said that astrology cannot be investigated by science. No. They make fun of a man for saying it can. Every last cowardly one of them knows very well astrology can be investigated by science. No. They point out that if the requirements for a valid theory are changed to include ID, they would also include astrology as a VALID theory. In other words, ID doesn't pass the current requirements for a VALID theory. Nothing was said at all about whether either one could be investigated by science. If you disagree with my description of the court records please provide a quote from the records to refute my assessment. The press who hyped it know this. The judge knows this. The sniveling lawyers - everyone! You do realize that the founder of the Discovery Institute was a lawyer, don't you? Regardless, no-one knows that Michael Behe was being made fun of because he said that astrology could be investigated by science. Michael Behe never said that because that was not brought up in the testimony or the cross-examination. The argument is not made on its merit; I never said it was. It is a pure, distilled appeal to emotion. You haven't shown that this argument was made at all. Please try again.
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
