Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
It's not even accurate, if anyone cares to read what was actually said. It's not "the requirements of science" he's discussing; it's a legalistic "official definition" that's in question.
An official definition put forth and agreed to by the majority of scientists.


Originally Posted by Transcript

Q Now, you claim that intelligent design is a
6 scientific theory.
7 A Yes.
8 Q But when you call it a scientific theory, you re
9 not defining that term the same way that the National
10 Academy of Sciences does.
11 A Yes, that s correct.

We're supposed to believe the National Academy of Sciences constitutes a majority of scientists?

Are we to believe an organization with a Steering Committee devoted to exterminating creationism would publish a definition of 'science' that wasn't carefully worded to exclude Intelligent Design and Creation Science?

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309064066
Quote
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition STEERING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND CREATIONISM Francisco J. Ayala (Chairman) Donald Bren Professor of Biological Sciences Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Irvine, California Ralph J. Cicerone Chancellor Aldrich Professor of Earth System Science University of California Irvine, California M. T. Clegg Professor of Genetics College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of California Riverside, California G. Brent Dalrymple Dean College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Richard E. Dickerson Molecular Biology Institute University of California Los Angeles, California Stephen J. Gould Professor of Geology Agassiz Professor of Zoology Harvard University The Agassiz Museum Cambridge, Massachusetts Dudley R. Herschbach Professor of Science Department of Chemistry Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts Donald Kennedy Bing Professor of Environmental Sciences Stanford University Stanford, California Joseph D. McInerney Director Biological Sciences Curriculum Study Colorado Springs, Colorado John A. Moore Professor Emeritus of Biology Department of Biology University of California Riverside, California Jeremiah P. Ostriker Provost Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey George Rupp President Columbia University New York, New York Eugenie Scott Executive Director National Center for Science Education El Cerrito, California Barbara Schulz Lakeside School Seattle, Washington Steven M. Stanley Professor of Paleobiology Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland Staff Donna M. Gerardi, Director, Office on Public Understanding of Science, National Academy of Sciences Paul Gilman, Executive Director, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council (through September 1998) Alvin Lazen, Associate Executive Director, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council (through September 1998) Kit Lee, Senior Project Assistant Steve Olson, Consultant Editor Erika C. Shugart, Research Associate, Office on Public Understanding of Science, National Academy of Sciences


I have no interest in drinking such Koolaide. Those who do, they're responsible for their decision.


Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson