Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
Originally Posted by LinearAq
The same way you do on your test...by adding up the numbers.
If you're going to trip over your thumbs and fall flat on your face, I suggest dodging isn't worth the effort.
My attempt at humor fell on deaf ears (or would that be blind eyes since you were reading it?). Even so, you couldn't resist being snide, could you?
The "attempt at humor" might've been easier to detect if it had been accompanied or followed by an answer.

...then again, maybe the omission of answer is supposed to be the funny part...
Quote
Quote
As for your false analogy, I think its employment speaks to the weakness of your case.

Spelling it out, lest anyone pretend not to understand: the point is not that disagreement exists; the point is that evolutionists are in disagreement with their own experts. The very people they send us to for evidence that they are right! These same experts agree with us on more of the relevant points.

Actually it is chemists and biologists researching abiogenesis that are in disagreement as to the mechanism by which life came about....lest anyone try to make more of it than it is. Indeed they all agree that the process was a chemical one. Seems like they are only in disagreement over the which chemical processes were involved.
Their disagreement is over which hair-brained scenario is even plausible enough to pursue.

"Chemical process"... get real. Life is made of physical, chemical matter. We know chemicals would be involved. The agreement is that God was not involved, and this agreement is reflected in the scores I tallied.
Quote
Quote
If I send someone to a Hindu to verify something, you may expect said Hindu to largely agree with me on the relevant points. Maybe this expectation is not the case with everyone? Maybe that's just how I roll?

So they would agree that Jesus is the only path to everlasting life? Color me surprised.
You colour yourself something else. I have not sent you to a Hindu to ask about Jesus. I do not recognize any Hindu as an expert in discussing Jesus.

Evolutionists have directed us to look at what these researchers have to report. See the difference(s) yet?

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson