Originally Posted by CTD
Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
How do you score on your own little test?

The same way you do on your test...by adding up the numbers.
If you're going to trip over your thumbs and fall flat on your face, I suggest dodging isn't worth the effort.
My attempt at humor fell on deaf ears (or would that be blind eyes since you were reading it?). Even so, you couldn't resist being snide, could you?

Quote
As for your false analogy, I think its employment speaks to the weakness of your case.

Spelling it out, lest anyone pretend not to understand: the point is not that disagreement exists; the point is that evolutionists are in disagreement with their own experts. The very people they send us to for evidence that they are right! These same experts agree with us on more of the relevant points.

Actually it is chemists and biologists researching abiogenesis that are in disagreement as to the mechanism by which life came about....lest anyone try to make more of it than it is. Indeed they all agree that the process was a chemical one. Seems like they are only in disagreement over the which chemical processes were involved.

Quote
If I send someone to a Hindu to verify something, you may expect said Hindu to largely agree with me on the relevant points. Maybe this expectation is not the case with everyone? Maybe that's just how I roll?

So they would agree that Jesus is the only path to everlasting life? Color me surprised.

Perhaps you could enlighten me as to the particular relevant points upon which you and the Hindu would agree and an atheist would disagree? This would greatly help in my understanding how your statistical analysis is less false than mine.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke