Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by Russ
Originally Posted by LinearAQ
No mistake in the math that I could see. It is just a statistic that is pretty meaningless so I thought it had to be a joke.


Ohhhh... Now was that really necessary? jesuslovesyou

As an explanation of my original reaction to the post, yes.

If it is not a meaningless statistic, then CTD or you can explain how it even says anything substantive about the validity of a particular belief on the beginning of life.
What's to argue?

From an evolutionists' perspective it is pretty meaningless that they're conclusion is in conflict with their own experts. All that matters is that they remain lovingly devoted to the conclusion. As an evolutionologist, I wouldn't expect it to be otherwise.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson