Please quote a scientist who said that astrology cannot be scientifically investigated?
That's my point exactly! You criticize the position that astrology is subject to scientific investigation, yet you dare not come out and say it isn't.
Where did I criticize the position that astrology is subject to scientific investigation? Please provide quotes from me that support your assertion.
The argument is based upon scaring people with the bug-a-boo word "astrology".
It's a cheap knock-off of agrumentum ad Hitlerum.
Just thought I would start doing what has worked for you.
It is perfectly correct to say science can investigate astrology, so why mock someone for saying so?
I didn't.
Any definition of 'science' which excludes investigation of astrology must be defective - not the other way around.
The definition of "theory" in science does not exclude investigation of astrology. It just excludes astrology from being a theory because it has been falsified.
I never said anything about nor alluded to the definition of "science".
I never said nor alluded to the idea that astrology cannot be investigated.
Has reading comprehension always been a problem with you or is this just a recent phenomenon?
