|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 644
Elite Member
|
Actually, he doesn't quote Mike. The whole argument there is an appeal to emotion and ignorance. I did not claim to "quote" Dr. Behe. However you can look at the transcripts for the trial here. Try Day 11 PM starting on page 33. It plays on people's aversion to astrology, which we're told has been debunked by science. If astrology were immune to scientific inquiry, science would be powerless to debunk it. The conclusion that astrology can be investigated scientifically is unavoidable. The very people who present this argument claim it's already been done. The argument logically defeats itself, but oh! The emotional pull... it's just so irresistible ...someone help me! Please quote a scientist who said that astrology cannot be scientifically investigated?
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|