What's Wrong with You Linear

You seem to be so bent on believing that evolution occurs, yet you fail to acknowledge the mountains of mounting evidence that demonstrates that so-called evidence for evolution has been regularly produced fraudulently.

As I have explained in great detail in previous posts, evolution is a social control being used to dethrone the God of the Bible and to put the current banking elite in His place.

Of course, the Bible predicted that this would happen thousands of years ago, but so many stubbornly refuse to examine this evidence. Have you?

Not surprisingly, this stubborn refusal to view evidence that opposes their preferred faith is a common attitude of faithful followers of the evolution religion, yet refusing to view this evidence is intellectually dishonest.

Let's look at good scientific truth.

I previous said:

"The small non-complex mutations that are becoming part of a complex system would certainly be harmful, useless mutations and would be selected out long before they ever had a chance to develop more complexity."

This speaks upon one of the many fundamental problems with evolution. With exploding information about the cell, we know that Darwin had no idea how complex things are, and as a result, his opinions about mutations and natural selection have long since become outdated.

Nevertheless, those refusing to abdicate their power which relies on the acceptance of the evolution religion continue promoting and marketing false evidence to support their antiquated religion (evolutionism).

Nevertheless, the truth that small mutations, although nearly always harmful, form components that are beneficial to the organism, is now discredited because of what we now know about the cell.

In short, regardless of the alterations of genetic information, the parts that are constructed of proteins are themselves dependent on an immensely complex array of nanomachines that produce proteins and facilitate protein folding, not to mention those nanomachines involved in DNA duplication and transport. The chance that this multilayered machinery that is interdependent across multiple layers formed by mutation is, in all honestly, completely on par with a belief in magic.

Furthermore, when you add the requirement that each part of a mutation must be beneficial as a more complex system develops as is required by natural selection, you have exceeded the bounds of absurdity.

Irreducible complexity is one of many brick walls to natural selection, and intellectually honest scientists must humbly let the data lead them rather than relying on fanatical arguments like so-option to save their dying faith.

My position stands.

I also made this statement:

"If it takes 1,000,000 harmful mutations to form a part of what will become a complex subsystem later (and for some strange reason it is not selected out), we now have a situation where there is a much stricter requirement about what type of mutation will be "beneficial"."

You have failed to show any fault in this simple logic. Please show me exactly what you believe to incorrect and I'll respond.

Or do you believe that complex systems become easier and easier to design as their complexity increases?

My position stands. (That was easy)

You said:

"The widespread acceptance of Literal Genesis Creationism in the face of mountains of evidence to refute it, is little more than a demonstration of the sheep-nature of Evangelical Christians."

(1) As you explore the "mountains of evidence to refute it", you discover that each and every one of these arguments break down into fantastically ridiculous assumptions.

(2) You have yourself put your faith in those who have attempted to discredit intelligent design, and as ironic as it is, you have not studied ID enough to make a good argument against it. Ironically, this is your faith.

Do you also have faith in those who have produced mountains of evidence showing that NutraSweet is perfectly safe?

Do you also have faith in those who have produced mountains of evidence showing that mercury-amalgam dental fillings are perfectly safe?

Do you also have faith in those who have incessantly claimed that GMO foods are perfectly safe?

Shall I go on?

The ironic fact is, your faith in the integrity of mankind is a faith unequaled in it's assumptions and failed history. Ironically, the Bible warns against putting such faith in the integrity of men with agendas. With all due respect, you would do well to check it out.

And concerning your statement about faith in Genesis, the ironic truth is, the more we learn about the design, complexity, capabilities of reproduction, and symmetry of biological systems, the more intelligent design becomes obvious.

You may want to check this out:

Russ Explains His Position on Creation

All the best!

Evolution is a social control.