In reading the responses to my founding post (the post starting this thread), I can only say that my original post stands. There has been no information presented that refutes it.

I believe this is because, perhaps deep in their minds, evolutionists know that the chance that random mutation can form highly-complex, symmetrical, self-replicating, sexual (male and female) machines is not just unlikely, it is absurd at its foundation.

The fact is, when considering complex machines, the odds of mutation creating ever-more specialized parts—of the machine or system—decrease dramatically (to say the least) as the number of parts increases. To deny this is to deny basic logic.

The widespread acceptance of evolution it little more than a demonstration of the sheep-nature of humans.