I gave it a little more thought, this business of explaining the obvious. What this thread is about is really easy to grasp. Problems for atheistic evolutionists would include the problems of atheism, the problems of evolutionism, and any problems that might be incurred when blending the two. Now the latter would seem unlikely to crop up, since Darwinism was a careful reformulation geared to promote atheism, and based upon his atheist grand-daddy's speculations.

Another way to approach it: ask yourself if you were an atheist evolutionist, what categories of information and questions would be problems for your worldview.

Polite or not, I will laugh if anyone pretends not to understand now.

I suppose it might not hurt to formally implement a competence rule. Those who, for whatever reason, really, really, really, have difficulty understanding plain, ordinary English should have sense enough to refrain from responding. I don't know too many people who go to forums in languages they don't have a clue how to understand, and start raising cane just to disrupt the discussions. But maybe I don't get around enough; maybe this is what passes for good manners in 2008?