Hello Lynnmn

Your statement below implies some things that you might not be aware of:

Originally Posted by Lynnmn
And about the Carbon 14 thing..
What can effect dateings on that.
The DVD Evolution, Creation and Logic expands on that line of thought.
Pretty interesting DVD but I do see that some people are set in what they want to believe in so..
why I and others would see the " erratic" ect as meaningfull..


The DVD does provide information on things that can affect Carbon Dating, but it does other things too.

It suggests that the people in that field of study either:
1. Don't know what can affect Carbon Dating ...or...
2. They purposely ignore the things that could affect Carbon Dating.

This is somewhat akin to saying that your plumber:
1. Doesn't know what can cause leaks in your pipes...or...
2. Purposely ignores what can cause leaks in your pipes.

This would make your plumber either ignorant in his area of expertise, or dishonest.

So, do you believe it is appropriate, from a layman's point of view, to say that the geologists and physicists that perform the radiometric dating are ignorant in their field of study?

Maybe we should just say they are dishonest.

Do you have another option that I may have missed?

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke