|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
The logic behind your doubt is twice flawed. There is no reason to assume that a single definition of 'mutation' exists, even among "genetics and molecular biology publications." Even if it were so (which it demonstrably is not), that does not mean the imaginary single definition differs from that which I stated they were probably applying. (Bold mine for emphasis.) Could I get you to demonstrate how this is "demonstrably" not so? Could you provide evidence which indicates the definition for mutation from source to source is so completely different from the next that it is impossible to create a definition for the word at all? Could you bother to find out how pronouns work in English? I expect everyone else is capable of reading what I clearly wrote without becoming confused, and it might save you from embarrassing yourself in the future. Or, barring that since I have a strong suspicion you will be unable to do this can you please provide us with CTD's personal definition of mutation and see where we can go from there? Scroll up. I have no need of a personal definition, but as you're keen to be numbered among those who don't understand plain English, you may benefit from the definition I found earlier. Regrettably, it is also written in English. You are welcome.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
