I used quite a few words in the English language to make that post. I have no intention of defining every last single word I used. If you maintain that this is needful, you can start setting an example and provide definitions of every single word you use.
You haven't asked for any. I only asked you to define 3 phrases yet you bluster about how difficult it is instead of simply stating what you meant by it.
Get real. You ask me to waste time "proving" all sorts of things we all know. I've already told you I'm using classic English definitions - nothing sneaky. Do you understand English?
You've already grossly misidentified the premise(s) in the post. Now you talk of a conclusion? You just got done saying I up & claimed harmful mutations must outnumber beneficial mutations. I did nothing of the sort. I provided a simple, reasoned demonstration that this must happen. But because you don't like the outcome (even 'though you say it has no bearing on your belief) you can't even discuss it accurately.
You say it must happen yet you fail to say what harmful and beneficial mutations are.
Do you speak English?
So how are we to research this and come up with the same conclusion as you if we don't know where you started from?
I don't know what resources are available in your area for learning English. I know I can't teach you the language over the internet.
It seems like you are wasting more time replying that you don't want to waste time than you would spend providing a few simple explanations of what you mean by harmful and beneficial mutations.
But this time isn't wasted. This is amusing and instructional. Amusement and instruction are worthy to spend a little time pursuing.
We have a fine example of just how people behave when they have no worthwhile response, but want to appear to argue.
For instance, would you have me believe you're actually so ignorant that you don't know I'm being very, very, very generous with the ratio of good to bad mutations? Does anyone doubt you'd take offense if I assumed you were so ignorant?
There is nothing wrong with being ignorant. That means that a particular piece of knowledge is not held by the person who is ignorant of it. We are all ignorant of something. Besides, even if I did know you were being generous, which I don't, others reading this might like to have a clear understanding of this earth-shattering scientific rebuttal to the theory of evolution. You are putting forth the idea so you should try and make it clearly understood. The fact that you find reasons not to do so, seems indicative of the low value that you really place on this silly hypothesis.
I see you don't intend to answer my questions. You have a very one-way approach to discussions.
I'll tell you what I do assume. I do assume you've found no actual flaws in what I said. You can beat around the bush if you want, but so what? None of it can make evolutionism work.
I'm not beating around the bush.
I see you're unfamiliar with the phrase "beating around the bush." It does not have to do with literal bushes. Perhaps you can find a translator who can provide an equivalent saying in your native language.
I asked for a little clarification of the starting assumptions for this misanthrope of a proof and I don't see how anyone can be asked to subscribe to it on its extremely hollow face value.
No. Scroll up and see. You ask me to verify facts of common experience and common knowledge. You asked me to verify that evolutionists believe even the smallest differential in fitness can be immediately detected and "selected"; then you proved it for me. You ask me to define commonly-used, simple terms. You do not demonstrate that there's any need, beyond wasting time.
For example, is there any difficulty at all which arises from using the classic sense of the term 'mutation' in the manner I have used it? There is not. If there were, you would have jumped all over it. I have not used ambiguous language; I have used clear, ordinary English. So do you speak English, or not?
Also, is there any premise involved in my reasoning which you would like to get around to disputing, after so many posts?
I submit
these results in case you're as ignorant as you profess to be. But I should caution you that most of the results are in English.
