I don't see much way to prevent you from assuming whatever you want to assume.

What I have done was to demonstrate that harmful mutations must accumulate at a far faster pace than beneficial mutations, even if one grants every benefit of doubt to the evolutionist cause. The only doubt I do not grant is 100% automatic selection when a fitness change of less than 100% is involved.

Have you given me any reason to think my conclusion is erroneous? Certainly not.

You and LindaLou have instead insisted I must provide proof of trivial, commonly-known facts. You practice the art of refuting an argument by never addressing it. Such as are fooled by this technique cannot be helped much by the likes of myself. They have no interest in facts and are not concerned with science or truth.

Not a very direct response. I shall proceed at my own convenience.