|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 644
Elite Member
|
What fields of biology do Linda and Russell2 work in again? Criticizing them doesn't criticize the theory of evolution. Could have worded that better. You make it sound ad hom. The merits of the idea(s) were criticized in my post - not the individuals. Agreed. Were those ideas the ideas of professional evolution biologists? Since I asked for quotes from professionals in the field and you said you didn't intend to get information from the professional, I assumed that you were not debating the theory of evolution. Are you now saying that you intend to debate the theory? If you like, I can demonstrate that even professional evolutionists misunderstand 'natural selection'. Ah! I love the smell of a good quote mine in the morning. We have no evidence that you care. Why shouldn't you just say "well, they subscribe to a different version than I do"? Or "not everyone with a degree and a career in evolution really understands it"? As there is no longer an official reference for what evolutionism is about, there's always an excuse. My objections to your criticizing the theory of evolution based on the statements of people you met on the internet are quite valid. However, I see that I don't have to worry about it since you're just criticizing evolutionism, as your latest statement says.
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|