|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
What fields of biology do Linda and Russell2 work in again? Criticizing them doesn't criticize the theory of evolution. First, I still remember who requested, nay insisted there was a need to demonstrate that evolutionists say these things. Have you forgotten so soon? Second, it does not follow that an idea cannot be criticized just because it has no official publication describing it. Were that the case, one couldn't criticize astrology, the moon hoax theories, or any other idea that lacked an official, universally acknowledged document, detailing its content. Evolution is not exempt from criticism, just because Darwin was wrong and his book has been abandoned. Live with it. Neither is it correct to think there aren't several varieties of evolutionism.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
