Jeannie,

I understand what you're saying, so let me tell you what the problem with relabeling evolution is.

They are trying to relabel evolution as natural selection, but there are problems of integrity in attempting to do this:

(1) They are attempting to deny that evolution was ever considered abiogenesis. This is a lie.

(2) Natural selection already has a label. Why add another label to it? Answer: Confusion, like the shell game.

Clearly, with new technology and information being exposed, it is becoming clear that abiogenesis is stupid, so the priests of evolution are changing history. I'm not talking about the laypeople here, such as LindaLou. I'm talking about those who produce this ridiculous information.

So why are they doing this?

They are attempting to salvage faith in the evolution religion by changing its definition to something that is far less stupid: "Natural Selection"

This is dishonest, to say the least.

We should just be honest and say that all of the stuff that has been taught in schools and textbooks saying that evolution is rock-to-man theology is wrong. That would be the honest and responsible thing to do.

But the leaders of the evolution religion cannot do that because that would provoke people to begin questioning the integrity of the evolution priests, and they don't want that. They don't want their congregation to lose faith in them or to start realizing the value of their own common sense. It's far easier to retain the faith of the evolution congregation by lying.

The great irony here is that most evolutionists believe that Christianity is deceptive and manipulative, when in fact, the opposite is true.

Evolution is very deceptive, even from it's very foundation.

If you haven't already, I would strongly suggest watching these. Very good stuff:

Why Was The Flat-Earth Myth Promoted? (video)
http://urlbam.com/ha/M001F

Redefining Evolution: The Grand Retreat Begins (Video)
http://urlbam.com/ha/M000Z

Lies In The Textbooks (video)
http://urlbam.com/ha/K