Honestly, sometimes your writing sounds like conventional Russian indoctrination.
I'm not trying to hurt your feelings, but I believe you actually like saying things like this type of emotional appeal.
Quote
There is an abundance of evidence for the existence of Christ and for the reliability of the Bible. Gematria, history, archeology, third source writers, prophecy. Those who cannot find it, simply do not want to.
Great, provide some convincing evidence and I will change my position.
Quote
Again, there is reliable evidence that Christ existed, and continues to exist. Again, if you do not find it, you don't want to.
Then show it to me instead of assuming that I have not looked for it. You don't need to imply that I am denying Christ.
Quote
Answer me honestly: Is Christ YOUR Lord?
Should I answer like you do? How about: There is abundant evidence that Christ is my Lord. If you cannot find it, you simply do not want to.
Quote
As I've clearly pointed out in another post, the Bible does not state the world to be 10,000 years old. In all likelihood, the Earth is old but was renewed and rearranged in recent history; At the beginning of this age.
Science has shown evidence of the existence of life as far back as 3 billion years. You have not claimed that, so we are in disagreement. But, show me the evidence that the existence of life is less than 10,000 old and I will change my mind.
Quote
How ironic it is that the scientific paradigm changes so often.
So, let's see:
Are amalgam fillings toxic?
Is mercury in vaccines toxic?
What is the age of the Earth? (Seems to be increasing at a rate of a few hundred million every few years.)
Why is NutraSweet safe?
Why is Saint John's Wort not effective?
How is it that Vitamin E does not help the body fight cancer?
Just as evolution, these conclusions are not science. I love science, but evolution is an affront to science and amounts to nothing more that soviet-style propaganda. Nothing more.
So, you would rather that science not change as information becomes available? You would not be able to peddle your wares on the internet if science had not changed a paradigm or two.
Quote
I am quite aware that you misrepresent yourself, as seems to be the ongoing saga of most evolutionists on this forum.
Thanks for calling me a liar. Since I don't think I am a liar, your statement must be slander. Does this mean you plan on banning yourself?
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
