I can't speak for what RAZD has said here and I think it's a little dishonest to be debating with him when he is not here to respond.
Demanding answers when you yourself have time and again refused to address more even issues... that's pretty arrogant.
Thanks for setting the record straight about name-calling. I'd love to see you write a post where you don't do this to anybody. Dare you.
I'm not great shakes with maths (since I got ill) or genetics, but there is no reason why I wouldn't address a post about any other scientific topic. What do you think I have not answered? Direct me there and I will.
Any luck tracking down that Öort Cloud yet?
Since I'm not an astronomer, that would be pretty difficult. You never explained why you think this is such a big factor for creationism. The next generation of telescopes will be able to research the outer reaches of the solar system. Are you claiming that because something has been logically postulated but not detected yet, it must not exist?
Any explanation of how work in astronomy is a threat to evolutionism?
I just addressed this comment from you in another thread. Put your creogoggles on and have another look.
You very well know how many I could list if it were worth the time.
I know how many times you've said this to me because you wanted to avoid talking about something.