|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
I don't have the time to go through this thoroughly at the moment but I do notice that there isn't any reference for your probability claims here -- no references for any claims here at all. Linear said something similar to you in another post -- start with faulty assumptions and you end up with faulty results. Can you show us where there figures came from please? I don't see how a reference makes any sense. By definition, if you improve the odds of survival by 1%, the lifeform involved will have a 1% better chance of surviving. You want a reference for such? How could you possibly need one? What good would it do to provide it if you can't fathom this from the get-go? Surely you'd be forced to rely upon authority alone.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
