Lynn, since you are new to the forum, it might be helpful if you have a look through the threads here.



Specific example please.



I've been writing on the topics of natural selection and astronomy recently. I have discussed geography, radiometric dating, and human origins. I usually reply if I see scientific misinformation being presented as fact. You can have a look around the forum if you don't believe me.



Please give an example of "bullying" from me. Is it bullying to point out factual inaccuracies in a debate? Maybe you have something else in mind?

I provide evidence for what I say and I expect people I talk to here to do the same. It's a way of showing that there's a basis in reality for what you are saying. In most forums this is considered debate, not bullying.



I have never called anyone here ignorant. I have sometimes suggested that they learn about what they are criticising before they criticise it, but only after they have demonstrated their lack of understanding. Should I not be talking about "true science" as opposed to "false science"? Should we not clarify what these terms mean?



Quite, if all you have to add to the discussion is a post full of insults. I wouldn't write a post like this to you.



There are people here who are interested in my posts and who have expressed respect for what I have to say. I guess you must be just as frustrated with them. Come to think of it, from someone who posts in the Bible forum so often, this isn't a very Christian post as I understand the term. I am aware of the problems you have with your children and I sympathise -- but you must understand that coming here and writing posts like this is not going to evoke thank-yous from the people they are addressed to.



Pleased to hear it. When you feel like talking about some science, as opposed to insulting me, you're welcome back.