Perhaps this isn't the math that you asked me to comment on, because it is not very well laid out for a math proof.
Indulge me. Please.
Tell me what's wrong with it.
Where should I start.
Your first assumption is that it takes 1,000,000 harmful mutations that have to build up to form a beneficial mutation. You say this as if it were fact but don't explain or support it.
What do you mean by this assumption? Are you saying that harmful mutations are required to work together to form beneficial ones. If so, what evolutionist scientists or papers have you seen in your vast research that actually say this?
If not, then what are you saying?
You say with this math that harmful mutations would build up in the population before a beneficial one would be realized. Is that what Darwin's theory says? Could you quote Darwin or any evolutionist scientist on this?
Without supporting your premise, your math, whether correct or not, is worthless. Faulty premise results in faulty conclusion. I am not proving your premise false because the burden is on you to show it to be true.
Until you show something besides your own assertion concerning how beneficial mutations would occur, there is no use moving on to the math.
(Did you notice that you're doing exactly what you've accused me of doing over and over: Making broad—opinion based—statements without providing evidence to back it up?)
Actually it is not opinion-based and I will share my evidence when you provide yours. I see no reason why I should waste time providing evidence that will be ignored when you have not provided anything more substantial than Hovind videos. You realize that Hovind doesn't support any of his sweeping statements either, don't you?
