I have taken the initiative and stickied this thread. I think it's in everyone's best interest if newcomers and lurkers get a good idea what kind of individuals have been participating here.

Russ, if you see this and disagree, just unsticky it. I don't intend to argue at all; but I don't think it's appropriate to bother you with every small matter.

The history herein speaks for itself, although some of it requires a little more education to understand. Some of it requires patience to wade through as well.

The star rating history speaks clearly. I rated the thread 5 stars, and it was downrated by someone who well understands the issues being misrepresented. I'm pretty sure it's peer-pressure kept this party anonymous, but naturally I cannot prove it without knowing who it was.

In the realm of science, deliberately presenting bad math is about as bad a thing as one can do. Even the higher evopriests wouldn't dare such a career-ending move.

This thread should not be interpreted as a typical example of all evolutionists. It is unique in my experience, a nadir of sorts, although I wouldn't call it their darkest moment overall. The majority of evolutionists I have encountered, even online evopushers, would not do a thread like this. I don't believe RAZD would've done it a couple of years ago, I honestly don't.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson