|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Freshman Member
|
Hi CTD A few comments from a long time lurker (I'm not a reincarnation of Russ2, RAZD or Pwcca). If this is true, your posts should reflect it. Emulating banned entities in the future would be unwise. Noted. Well I'm kinda peeved because I was really enjoying following the discussions on this forum. IMHO Pwcca, while not sharing the same degree of RAZD or Russ2's technical knowledge, was certainly eloquent and passionate. I was sorry to see him(?) go. Trying to bust the implausibleometer, I see. Just calling it as I see it. I've read RAZD's posts for a few years now on another forum and, till recently, here. RAZD won't claim something is "fact" without solid evidence to back it up. He's very thorough. It's quite another thing to claim something is the truth or fact over and over again without any tangible or credible evidence to support it. I don't see any evidence of RAZD doing that. Selective vision? This is not a time when propaganda is prudent. Well that's my opinion based on reading his posts (and supporting material). I don't see why that should be labeled "propaganda". aves
Last edited by aves; 11/04/08 02:42 AM.
|
|
|
|
|