Kia ora Bex
A few comments from a long time lurker (I'm not a reincarnation of Russ2, RAZD or Pwcca).
You are angry because two of the major support links to propping up the theory have been banned because they decided to take their arrogance a little too far and subject the owner to contempt, mockery and questioning of his own mental status and making false claims about his motives. The only reason you're not too bothered by Pwcca, is because he's pretty disposable in regards to what he does for the theory of evolution.
Well I'm kinda peeved because I was really enjoying following the discussions on this forum. IMHO Pwcca, while not sharing the same degree of RAZD or Russ2's technical knowledge, was certainly eloquent and passionate. I was sorry to see him(?) go.
Your ideas of truth may not be shared by the rest of the readers on this forum.
Yes that's quite right, and that is why people come here - to discuss & debate.
I've noticed there is a lot of commentary required telling everybody over and over it's "truth"! RAZD used to resort to this also.
I've read RAZD's posts for a few years now on another forum and, till recently, here. RAZD won't claim something is "fact" without solid evidence to back it up. He's very thorough. It's quite another thing to claim something is the truth or fact over and over again without any tangible or credible evidence to support it. I don't see any evidence of RAZD doing that.
One wonders why you're not comfortable enough with the apparent obvious evidence that's been put across on here to let people come to their own conclusions in that regard? I guess they require your seal of approval and "truth stamping", so they can have you decide for them? They can read and look for themselves surely?
Ummm for the same reason that you comment here Bex? To debate, express, compare and/or challenge your thoughts or belief system? Or perhaps because you don't like seeing your notion of truth being misrepresented? Is that not the purpose of a forum, especially one dedicated to this subject?
You can present information, but you may not be able to convince everybody by repetitive commentary Linda, due to another side being presented now that evolution does not want people to know about.
I doubt that LindaLou thinks she can "convince everybody". And if she seems repetitive then that could be because she's facing the same old PRATTS (points refuted a thousand times)over and over again.
I'm looking forward to reading this other "side" that evolution "doesn't want people to know about".
In the end, the apparent scientific truckloads of evidence for your theory would have bowled us over long ago and silenced all arguments.
In the end, most people believe what they
want to believe, even if it flies in the face of reality & logic.
And if it were so obvious, you'd hardly waste your time on here in such a state of desperate insecurity.
Well that's rather unkind. Linda certainly doesn't come across as desperate or insecure to me. I enjoy her posts and I don't deem reading them as being a waste of my time.
So much in my view has already been presented on the forum. I don't think either CTD or Russ is honestly too bothered about feeling obligated to going in similar circles. Since there isn't really any excuse for anybody to state that they can't view both sides.
and if you feel our side has been so poorly presented, and yours so totally convincing, then why not sit back, relax and have quiet giggle as you make us look silly?
Leave that to the lurkers
aves
