RUBBISH. The pair of them have been on this forum for a relatively long time putting up this so-called "scientific" information freely on this forum without restriction.

You are angry because two of the major support links to propping up the theory have been banned because they decided to take their arrogance a little too far and subject the owner to contempt, mockery and questioning of his own mental status and making false claims about his motives. The only reason you're not too bothered by Pwcca, is because he's pretty disposable in regards to what he does for the theory of evolution.

Your ideas of truth may not be shared by the rest of the readers on this forum. I've noticed there is a lot of commentary required telling everybody over and over it's "truth"! RAZD used to resort to this also.

One wonders why you're not comfortable enough with the apparent obvious evidence that's been put across on here to let people come to their own conclusions in that regard? I guess they require your seal of approval and "truth stamping", so they can have you decide for them? They can read and look for themselves surely?

You can present information, but you may not be able to convince everybody by repetitive commentary Linda, due to another side being presented now that evolution does not want people to know about. In the end, the apparent scientific truckloads of evidence for your theory would have bowled us over long ago and silenced all arguments. And if it were so obvious, you'd hardly waste your time on here in such a state of desperate insecurity.

So much in my view has already been presented on the forum. I don't think either CTD or Russ is honestly too bothered about feeling obligated to going in similar circles. Since there isn't really any excuse for anybody to state that they can't view both sides.

and if you feel our side has been so poorly presented, and yours so totally convincing, then why not sit back, relax and have quiet giggle as you make us look silly?