If he wants to fill the first page with locked threads, it is his prerogative.
Threads were locked for obvious reasons.
If he keeps posting the same old same old already been discussed stuff and then complain when new people want to open the discussion and ask for some kind of substantiation, then that is his prerogative too.
You are misrepresenting me, and you know it. This is slander.
If he wants to ban people for making him uncomfortable, then that is his prerogative.
You seem to want to be banned judging by the fact that you are misrepresenting me again.
That's exactly what I thought when I read the post. I was somewhat surprised, but then I remembered how brazen RAZD has become. To intentionally insult and slander the host of a forum is to invite banning.
I find it amusing that anyone can manage to feign surprise. The quotes are right there in your post, RT, yet some would pretend it's a matter of forgetting what was said and omitting to scroll up.
Now if you want this forum to be a showcase of lairs and cowards demonstrating lies and cowardice, you should not be banning. But if you have other intentions (and we have indications this is the case) your crackdown is not only justified; it's ...well, it's overdue. I understand some of the reasons why, and my use of the term 'overdue' is not meant to express complaint(s). You have suffered many slanders, as have others, and true to well-established patterns, those who get away with such do not count themselves lucky and quit while the quitting's good.
To judge by what's been seen on this forum, folks'd think there are no honest evolutionists. This is not the case. I have encountered some myself. It would be a good thing if some show up here. Until that happens, we must make do; but this does not mean we have to suffer insult and abuse.
It does make me angry to see good people maligned, and I have striven to set things straight on more than one occasion. I am thankful that I have been allowed to do so here. On other forums I've seen what happens when one is unwilling to let slanders go uncorrected. As a matter of policy, I don't participate on forums that support dishonesty.
That's enough for now. It might have been more preferable had RAZD been banned for a slander against another party in some respects, but folks should think about the situation. RAZD brazenly posted that junk during a crackdown, knowing full well none of it was remotely close to being the case, knowing he was falsely portraying RT, the host of the forum. Either he knew what to expect, or Satan tricked the pants off him.
If he wants to ban people for disagreeing with his conspiracy theories, then that is his prerogative.
Obviously you want to push me to the point of banning you. Regardless of what your purposes are for intentionally slandering me is, you are being immoral.
Having a closed discussion forum doesn't make it honest or the truth.
Judging by your intentional misrepresentations of my character (slander), you have no regard for truth.
I shouldn't comment too much here. We have a considerable body of additional evidence in support of the conclusion.
