I think the fact that the tests show this much toxic material is very telling. There should not be those kinds of levels in the atmosphere even considering all of the other forms of pollution. Not even close.

Also, most of the spraying that I have personally witnessed has been low altitude spraying, although high altitude spraying could certainly be targeted when the atmospheric conditions are known (which they are).

I can tell you from my personal experience that I felt the health effects of the spraying activity 15 to 25 minutes after the spraying started, and during this time, both Laura and I experienced health symptoms including cracking joints, ringing in the ears, extreme fatigue, dark circles under the eyes, joint pain, heartburn, oily skin, and much more. Not surprisingly, these symptoms are nearly identical to mercury poisoning.

So, as far as the atmospheric testing goes, I would love to participate in getting some tests done, but unfortunately, they cost hundreds of dollars (I know because I spoke with a lab yesterday), and until people are willing to pitch in and help out, I'm going to make sure th air I'm breathing is as clean as possible. People who are unwilling to participate will have to make their own decisions.

Nevertheless, I don't know how you would "exclude" other types of pollution from samples.

How would that be done?

How do we know where the pollution came from?

These are tough problems; All good questions, but for me, I've been alive long enough to know to run for cover when I see bombs falling. I don't need to view the flash to be convinced that danger is near.

I hope this makes sense.