There have been numerous discussions here about these probability figures. a) they are based on certain assumptions and b) some people don't realise that trillions of simple organisms over the world, replicating perhaps once a day or so, over a few billion years, can stack up quite a lot of mutations. This puts the "incredulous" factor into perspective I think.

Secondly, evolution has got nothing to do with amalgams. Fossil evidence in the geological record showing change over time has got to do with evolution; continents moving has got to do with plate tectonics; ice moving is glaciology. Then you've got people putting a metal which is known to be toxic in people's mouths. Of course it's going to affect some people who can't detox it properly.

RAZD kept asking you to show how heritable traits in populations do not, in your belief, change over time, because this is the essence of ToE. It's got nothing to do with conspiracies, Hitler, amalgams, chemtrails or whatever. What is lacking here is concrete evidence on the creationists' side that ToE is wrong and that life was created as we see it now, 6000 years ago. Though actually you said you don't believe the world is 6000 years old and repeated requests for you to define your position have gone unanswered.